top of page
Search
  • Writer's pictureTTechblog

Samsung Galaxy Z fold 5 vs Google Pixel Fold

Welcome to the world of foldable smartphones. In this era of advancing mobile technology, two tech giants have stepped into the spotlight with their latest creations – the Samsung Z Fold 5 and the Google Pixel Fold. These two remarkable devices represent the pinnacle of modern engineering, pushing the boundaries of what a smartphone can be.

Foldable smartphones have come a long way from being prototypes to becoming fully functional, everyday devices that promise to transform our digital experiences. The Samsung Z Fold 5 and the Google Pixel Fold stand at the forefront of this revolution, boasting stunning designs and a lot of features that challenge each other's technologies. As we dive into the factors of these two devices, we'll explore their design philosophies, innovative features, and the unique user experiences they bring to the table.



Samsung Z fold and Pixel Fold



Price, availability and specs:

The Samsung Z Fold 5 enjoys a significantly broader availability compared to the Google Pixel Fold. You can find the Galaxy Z Fold 5 in nearly every mobile device retailer across the globe. However, the Pixel Fold, in contrast, is exclusively available in four select countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Germany.

Both Galaxy Z fold 5 and Google Pixel fold are priced same at $1799.


Google Pixel Fold

Samsung Galaxy Z fold 5

Processor

Tensor G2 with Titan M2 co-processor

Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (4nm)

Display

7.6-inch OLED / 5.8-inch OLED

1840 x 2208 pixels / 1080 x 2092 pixels

7.6-inch OLED / 6.2-inch OLED

1812 x 2176 pixels / 904 x 2316 pixels

Refresh Rate

120Hz

120Hz

Ram

12GB

12GB

Storage

256GB, 512GB

256GB,512GB. 1TB

Battery

4821mAh

44oomAh dual battery

Operating System

Android

One UI 5.1.1 (Android 13)

Rear Camera

48MP wide, 10.8MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP telephoto w/ 3x optical zoom

50MP wide, 12MP ultra-wide, 10MP telephoto w/ 3x optical zoom

Front Camera

8MP and 9.5MP


10MP and 4MP

Charging

30W wired fast charging, Qi wireless charging

Up to 50% in 30 minutes (25W wired), Fast Wireless Charging 2.0, Wireless PowerShare

IP Rating

IPX8

IPX8

Design and Hardware:

These two foldable smartphones, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 and the Google Pixel Fold, embody distinct design philosophies. The Z Fold 5 adopts a tall and narrow bar phone configuration when closed, transforming into a larger portrait screen when opened. In contrast, the Pixel Fold emulates the familiar form of a closed notebook when folded and an open notebook while the screen is opened.


When it comes to display quality, the Z Fold 5 takes the lead, particularly with its larger folding screen. Both devices feature OLED displays on both the exterior and interior, capable of supporting refresh rates of up to 120Hz. However, the Z Fold 5 shines brighter, reaching a peak brightness of 1,750 nits compared to the Pixel Fold's 1,450 nits. The Pixel Fold's screen has larger display and does have a slightly softer, almost plastic-like feel in contrast to the Z Fold 5's more glass-like touch.


The hinge mechanism is another area where Samsung's engineering technology shines through. The Z Fold 5's hinge is notably robust, capable of holding its position at virtually any angle, and it offers a satisfying snap when opening and closing. In contrast, the Pixel Fold's hinge falls short, with some models unable to open completely flat, and it generally lacks the premium feel offered by Samsung's design.


In this comparison, it's evident that both devices present unique design choices and capabilities, with the Z Fold 5 demonstrating a superior edge in display quality and hinge design. These distinctions will undoubtedly influence the user experience and personal preferences when choosing between these two remarkable foldable smartphones.


Software:

Both the Samsung Z Fold 5 and the Google Pixel Fold operate on the Android 13 platform, though they exhibit unique user experience elements. The Pixel Fold's software closely aligns with the official Android software, while Samsung utilizes its proprietary One UI.


When it comes to multitasking, the Z Fold 5 takes a noteworthy lead. On the Pixel Fold, you are limited to running just two apps simultaneously in split-screen mode. In contrast, the Z Fold 5 offers a more robust multitasking experience, allowing you to run up to three apps concurrently in split-screen mode. What's even more impressive is the resizable window mode on the Z Fold 5, which can accommodate up to five apps at the same time. This feature significantly enhances productivity and convenience, giving the Z Fold 5 a clear advantage.


Additionally, the Z Fold 5 supports Samsung DeX, a powerful feature that can extend your smartphone experience to external screens, either wired or wirelessly, creating a Windows-like sandbox user interface. Unfortunately, the Pixel Fold lacks this capability entirely. Moreover, the Pixel Fold's USB-C port cannot output the display to external screens.


Both phones, however, offer a persistent dock for quick app switching, making it easier for users to navigate between their frequently used applications.


In this aspect of software and multitasking capabilities, the Samsung Z Fold 5's enhanced functionalities provide a compelling reason for users to consider it over the Google Pixel Fold. These differences in user experience could significantly impact how users choose between these two exceptional foldable devices.


Performance:

A significant feather in the cap of the Galaxy Z Fold 5 is its status as the inaugural folding smartphone to feature the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, which is the most cutting-edge chip available for Android phones at the moment.


In contrast, Google has chosen to go down a different path by utilizing its in-house developed Tensor G2 chip. In terms of raw specifications and benchmark performance, the Tensor G2 chip doesn't quite match up, falling short even when compared to the previous year's Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.


However, Google's strategy with the Tensor chip lies in its focus on specialized AI capabilities. Rather than trying to outperform in raw processing power alone, Google has directed its efforts towards enhancing AI-specific features. This approach can potentially offer unique and intelligent functions that set the Pixel Fold apart in terms of AI-driven experiences.


So, while the Galaxy Z Fold 5 takes the lead in terms of sheer processing with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, the Google Pixel Fold maintains its position through AI-centric innovations. The choice between these two devices may ultimately hinge on individual preferences for either raw power or AI-driven intelligence.


Summary:

The Galaxy Z Fold 5 undeniably boasts superior speed, a broader array of software options, and an impressive array of multitasking features. Its camera capabilities also shine when compared to the Pixel Fold.


Yet, there's a lingering sense of awkwardness in the Z Fold 5's form factor. On the other hand, the Pixel Fold manages to strike a harmonious balance right from the start, delivering a more seamless and intuitive foldable experience.


The outer screen on the Pixel Fold, a practical and well-thought-out feature, makes a substantial difference in daily use. For most routine tasks, like checking messages or quickly browsing the web, there's no need to unfold the device, enhancing convenience and preserving the longevity of the internal display.


However, the Pixel Fold does have its share of drawbacks. The chip inside tends to overheat easily, which could impact performance and longevity. Being a first-generation device, it also raises questions about its durability and how it will hold up over extended use and potential abuse.


In the end, the choice between these two foldable devices comes down to a trade-off between the Z Fold 5's impressive specs and features versus the Pixel Fold's more refined form factor and practicality. It's a decision influenced by individual priorities, weighing performance against ease of use and long-term reliability.

Comments


bottom of page